Member Login
On Demand
Classifieds
Insurance
My Resources
My Practice Areas
Update Address
E-mail Preferences
My On Demand
My ePublications
My Classifieds
Member Card
Need a Lawyer?
Casemaker
Home
Membership
Member Get A Member
Appreciation Week
Member Benefits
Join/Renew Online
Dues Structure and Rates
Print an Application
Special Promotions
FAQs
Member Groups
MBA Sections/Division
Committees & Task Forces
Alternative Dispute Resolution Committee
Amicus Curiae Committee
Appellate Bench Bar Committee
Budget & Finance Committee
Crime Lab Task Force
Diversity Task Force
Education Committee
Executive Management Board
Fair and Impartial Judiciary Strike Force
Fee Arbitration Board Committee
Governance Committee
Insurance Committee
Joint Bar Committee
Joint Foreclosure Legislative Task Force
Law Day Task Force
Lawyer Referral Service Committee
Media Committee
Membership Committee
Mock Trial Committee
Plain English Jury Instruction Task Force
Tiered Mentoring Committee
Volunteer Recognition, Recruitment and Retention Task Force
Workplace Safety Task Force
CLE
MBA On Demand
CLE Programs
CLE Publications
Massachusetts Bar Institute
Events
Calendar
Event Form
2013 Annual Dinner Sponsors
For Attorneys
Casemaker
Affiliated Bar Services
Alternative Dispute Resolution
Ethical Inquiries
Fee Arbitration
Lawyers Eco-Challenge
Lawyer Referral Service
Mentor Program
Mentor Circles
Professional Development
Volunteer Opportunities
Publications
Guide to the Massachusetts Judicial Selection Process
e-Journal
Ethics Opinions
Lawyers Journal
Massachusetts Law Review
Section Review
Judicial Preference Guide
Submission Guidelines
Legislative Activities
MBA Reports
Drug Lab Crisis Resource Center
MUPC
The Legislative Process
Glossary of Legislative Terms
MBA Positions
Contacting Key Legislators
Section Council Legislative Procedures
Joint Bar Committee
Legislative Hearings
MBA memo on Senate Bill No. 2210
About the MBA
MBA Leadership
Press Room
Employees of the MBA
Mass Bar Foundation
Mass Bar Insurance
Office Locations
MBA Bylaws
Advertising with the MBA
For the Public
MBA Marathon Bombing Victims Legal Assistance Program
Need a Lawyer?
FAQs
Helpful Links
Public Service Fund
Public Information
Career Awareness
Law-Related Education
Publications
Guide to the Massachusetts Judicial Selection Process
e-Journal
Ethics Opinions
Lawyers Journal
Massachusetts Law Review
Section Review
Judicial Preference Guide
Submission Guidelines
Ethics Opinions
2010-2019
2000-2009
1990-1999
1980-1989
1973-1979
Search
1990-1999
1999
1998
1997
1996
1995
1994
1993
1992
1991
1990
1990
Opinion No 90-3
Opinion No 90-2
Opinion No 90-1
1990
Opinion No. 90-3
Summary:
In certain limited circumstances, a lawyer may represent a bank and close institutional mortgage loans when the borrower is also the lawyer's client provided the attorney has carefully reviewed the loan documents and found no apparent unresolved disqualifying conflicts between the interests of the borrower and the lender and if the attorney has obtained the informed consent of both borrower and lender after full disclosure. The committee believes that it is "obvious" that the attorney can adequately represent the interests of each in connection with such limited duties. The lawyer must stop the multiple representation if either party revokes consent, or it otherwise becomes clear during the multiple representation that the lawyer cannot adequately represent the interests of each party.
Opinion No. 90-2
Summary:
A lawyer discovers that a client, whom he represented a few years ago in a case involving criminal assault upon several young children in the client's care, has obtained a similar job caring for disturbed young children. If the lawyer believes, based on all the information in his possession, including information gained in the prior representation, that the client's proclivities rise to the level of "intention" to commit a crime against the children currently committed to his care, he may reveal that intention to the appropriate persons as well as information sufficient to prevent the crime, if he is unable to persuade the former client to make the appropriate disclosure.
Opinion No. 90-1
Summary:
If a client charged with a crime tells a lawyer that a witness is about to be murdered by a person involved in the crime, the lawyer has discretion to reveal the information to the appropriate authorities. If the information was a confidence or secret, DR 4-101(C)(3) permits the lawyer to reveal information sufficient to prevent the murder, whether or not the client would be criminally liable for the murder. Furthermore, the information received from the client may not even be a confidence or secret, but the committee has not sufficient facts to make a determination.
©2013 Massachusetts Bar Association